Friday, June 9, 2017

The forking of the Indian rupee


This post is about the dismantling of the rupee-zone between 1947-49, an historical event that is especially topical in light of two modern monetary projects: Narendra Modi's poorly-executed 2016 demonetization and a potential eurozone breakup.

Thanks to a recommendation by Amol Agrawal, who blogs at the excellent Mostly Economics, I've been pecking away at the 900-page history of the Reserve Bank of India, although I have to confess that I've spent most of my time on the chapter on the partition period. For those who don't know, India and Pakistan weren't always independent countries. Up until partition in August 1947, each was part of British India, a British colony. The rupee, which was issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), was the sole medium of exchange in British India. By mid-1949, less than two years after partition, usage of RBI-issued rupees had been successfully limited to the newly-created state of India. As for Pakistan, it had managed to erect its own central bank, the State Bank of Pakistan, as well as introduce a new currency, the Pakistani rupee.

At the time of partition, Pakistan's architects faced a daunting challenge; given that the Brits had announced in early 1947 that the partition of British India was to occur that August, there remained only a few months to create a central bank and issue a new currency. Because printing enough new currency for an entire nation would take far more than a few months to achieve, a temporary solution was arrived at: to use the RBI as an interim agent for issuing currency until the new Pakistani central bank had its own printing presses up and running.

This "bridge" involved using a combination of regular RBI-issued rupees circulating within Pakistan at the time and "overprinted" notes issued by the RBI. To ensure that the purchasing power of the two rupees stayed locked, the overprints were to be accepted by the RBI at par with regular notes. When enough Pakistani rupees had been printed by the newly-created State Bank of Pakistan, or the SBP, the mix of India rupees and overprinted notes was to be demonetized and replaced by Pakistani rupees on a 1:1 basis.

Here is what the Pakistani overprints looked like.


Note that they have the text "GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN" inscribed on them. Otherwise, overprints were just like regular rupees of the time.

---

Let's pause and bring this to the present. Like the rupee breakup of 1947-49, Modi's recent demonetization involved the cancellation of a large proportion of existing currency followed by an issue of new banknotes to replace them. (The 500 and 1000 rupee notes represented some 85% of India's paper money.) This is where the similarities between the two projects end. The architects of partition were wise enough to realize that they did not have enough time to print sufficient quantities of Pakistani rupees to replace Indian rupees, and so to avoid burdening the public with a shortage of cash they decided to use existing RBI-issued currency as a bridging mechanism.

Modi and his team of monetary architects evidently did not bother to familiarize themselves with RBI history. If they had, not only would they have realized what a huge task it is to replace the majority of a nation's currency, but they would also have learnt some tricks—like overprinting—to make the project easier. (Overstamping, a technique similar to overprinting, was successfully used in the break-up of the Austro Hungarian krona in 1991 as well as the Czechoslovak koruna in 1993.) This refusal to draw on the RBI's institutional memory means that some eight months after demonetization, Indians are still suffering from cash shortages.

---

Let's return back to the partition and explore the forking of the rupee more closely. The SBP, which was established July 1, 1948, formally took over the RBI-issued overprints as their liability that same day. As fresh Pakistan rupees came off the printing presses over the next months, SBP officials would steadily replace these overprints. That same day, the RBI subtracted the entire stock of overprinted notes from its total banknote liability. (The RBI had been issuing these notes since April.)

In taking over a large percent of the RBI's banknote liabilities, the SBP would need an equivalent set of assets to act as backing. These assets were to come from the RBI. More specifically, a fixed portion of the RBI's gold, coin, sterling-denominated securities, and rupee-denominated securities was to be transferred to the SBP, the rest remaining in India to serve a backing for RBI-issued rupee banknote.

To ensure fairness, a formula was settled on ahead of time to determine how the assets were to be apportioned. On a fixed date, the RBI would tally up how many notes were in circulation in Pakistan and how many in India, and divvy up the underlying assets according to the distribution of notes. That's fair way to do things, at least in theory. For the overprints, the RBI would record how many it had issued by July 1, 1948, and for each rupee overprint in existence it would transfer an equivalent quantity of assets to the SPB. When July 1 came, some 9.9% of the RBI's assets were dispatched to Pakistan. Thus one half of the mix of notes circulating in Pakistan, the overprints, had been demonetized.

There still remained the second half of the mix—regular Indian rupees. Dealing with these was more complicated. Unlike overprints, the RBI could have no firm measure for how many regular rupees were still being used in Pakistan, and thus had no way of knowing how many backing assets to transfer to the SBP. Intead, a mechanism for tallying up notes was established such that all Indian rupees circulating in Pakistan had to be brought to SBP offices for conversion into Pakistani rupees before July 1, 1949, one year after the central bank's founding. As Indian rupees flowed into the SBP over the course of the next twelve months, SBP officials remitted them to the RBI. The RBI then transferred an equivalent asset to the SBP for each Indian note it had received up until the expiry of the conversion period on July 1, 1949, after which the RBI ceased to accept remitted Indian rupees.

At this point, the RBI and the SBP were officially divorced. All liabilities and assets had been distributed to each respective party.

---

In a potential breakup of the euro, a formula like the one devised by the RBI will have to be used. The results, however, are likely to be messy. Because as I'll show, the divvying up of the RBI's assets wasn't without controversy.

If you look at the SBP's 2016 financial statements, you'll see an interesting line item called "Assets Held With the Reserve Bank of India":

Source


Go to note 14, and you'll see that:
"These assets were allocated to the Government of Pakistan as its share of the assets of the Reserve Bank of India under the provisions of Pakistan (Monetary System and Reserve Bank) Order, 1947. The transfer of these assets to the Group is subject to final settlement between the Governments of Pakistan and India"

So it seem that Pakistan never received what it believes to be its fair portion of the RBI's assets. For almost 70-years now it has carried these IOUs on its balance sheet (see historical date here). That's a long time to hold an asset that is unlikely to be collected! The reason for this odd balance sheet item can be found on page 568 or the aforementioned 900-page RBI tome. Between the founding of the SBP in July 1948 and the July 1949 cutoff date for note remittances to the RBI, more Indian rupees had filtered over the border into Pakistan than expected. As such, Pakistan was able to stake a larger claim on the RBI's assets than initially estimated.

Indian officials, who were not happy with the amount of assets they were sending over to Pakistan, now claimed that only those notes already in circulation in Pakistan as of July 1948 could legitimately be remitted for underlying assets. Any notes that were imported into Pakistan from India after that date simply would not count to the final tally. Pakistani disagreed. In March 1949 the Indian government informed the bank that "pending negotiations with the Pakistan Government further releases to them should be withheld." This was unfortunate news for the SBP. It had effectively issued Pakistani rupees without a reciprocating asset to back them.* That's where the two parties stand to this day—the SBP grudgingly holds the RBI's IOU on its books as reminder that it never got its perceived fair share of the RBI's assets.
---

This sort of havoc is inevitable when a monetary union breaks up. If existing notes are to be converted into new national notes at a one-to-one basis over a fixed period of time, then everyone has an incentive to export their notes to the region that is expected to have the strongest national currency. I am speculating here, but in September 1949—just three months after the RBI had been successfully divided—India devalued its rupee by 30.5%. Pakistan didn't. So all thoe holding Pakistani rupees were suddenly 30.5% richer than those holding rupees. Maybe the mass banknote exodus into Pakistan during the conversion period was an attempt to avoid this impending devaluation.

This same sort of dynamic would surely characterize a euro break-up. If Europeans are given 6-months to convert their euros into new national currencies like the German mark or the Greek drachma, you can bet that everyone will ship their euros to Germany. Drachmas, like the Indian rupee, are sure to be devalued. And if the final distribution of banknotes is to serve as the marker for divvying up the European Central Bank's assets, then Germany would get most of them. Were it to be prevented from getting its share, then Germany would end up in the same situation as Pakistan, with a shortage of good assets to back up all the fresh marks it has issued.

*If you're interested in specific amounts owed, here's an old World Bank document on the issue.

13 comments:

  1. This is fantastic and will force me to return to a piece on NCB and ECB accounting and politics.


    Just off the bat though I don't see any reason to think that distribution will be cash based. It seems to me quite clear that it will be based on equity shares which in turn:

    "The NCBs’ shares in this capital are calculated using a key which reflects the respective country’s share in the total population and gross domestic product of the EU"

    https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/orga/capital/html/index.en.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "It seems to me quite clear that it will be based on equity shares which in turn:"

      Thanks Nathan. What if a nation has a large Target2 liability that overwhelm it contribution to the ECB's capital?

      Delete
  2. "Between the founding of the SBP in July 1948 and the July 1949 cutoff date for note remittances to the RBI, more Indian rupees had filtered over the border into Pakistan than expected. As such, Pakistan was able to stake a larger claim on the RBI's assets than initially estimated."

    I don't get this. If the Indian rupees were held by people in Pakistan, then they would be an asset of those people, not of the SBP, and the SBP has no grounds to complain. If the Indian rupees were held by the SBP, and the RBI refused to redeem them, then the SBP could have sold the Indian rupees on the open market for their full value.

    And this: "It had effectively issued Pakistani rupees without a reciprocating asset to back them."

    Those Pakistani rupees had to be issued for assets of comparable value, so how did they have no asset to back them?


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Mr. Sproul...I guess can answer this and then get some additional insights from JP.

      During Partition there was an agreement that RBI will act as the central bank of Pakistan till Sep 1948. Thus RBI was printing notes for Pakistan territory and had assets backing the same. These assets were to goto Pakistan when Pakistan central bank would be established. SBP came up three months earlier as RBI refused to provide additional support to Pakistan. This led to differences and SBP came up in July 1948. Then the next set of differences was on account of note liabilities. Pakistan asked for higher share of not backing assets which again were refused by RBI. These balances remain outstanding till data as pointed by JP.

      Delete
    2. Mike, good points.

      "Those Pakistani rupees had to be issued for assets of comparable value, so how did they have no asset to back them?"

      You're right. Although I'd argue that the SBP still had grounds to complain because the assets they were owed were primarily composed of pounds held in London. Converting a hoard of paper Indian rupees held in Pakistan into an equivalent amount of sterling in London would have been a cumbersome process for the SBP entailing all sorts of handling costs, fees, and slippage (ie paying the difference between bid and ask).

      Delete
    3. Hi Amol:

      I'm not sure what you mean by "came up 3 months earlier", but if you mean that the SBP issued more Pakistani notes, earlier than expected, then the SBP would have gotten equal-valued assets for those notes, and would have no rightful claim to RBI assets to cover those notes.

      Delete
  3. JP another solution is to let Eurozone periphery keep Euro and introduce new currency in Germany and other core countriws. This would avoid some of the problems.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi David,

      Yes, that's another way to go about it. Although even then everyone will still try to get their euros into Germany during the conversion period given that the new Deutsche mark will inevitably rise in value vis a vis the euro.

      Delete
  4. Привет, друзья, я хочу сказать очень большое спасибо Джону Брауну, я миссис
    Джейн из США, я хочу поделиться свидетельством того, как моя жизнь изменилась
    ATM BLANK CARD, я был очень бедным человеком, даже чтобы поесть была очень большой проблемой
    для меня и моей семьи я ищу работу в другом месте, но не могу получить
    одна моя арендная плата и счета были слишком много для меня, чтобы заплатить, поэтому мне пришлось пойти в один
    из-за высокого уровня бедности я разочаровался до тех пор, пока
    один определенный день, когда я просматривал интернет, я видел много
    разные свидетельства разных людей, но одному человеку о том, как он их дал
    чистая карточка атлета, которая изменила их жизнь, из-за высокой скорости
    бедность, которая влияла на меня, я должен был на нее подать, они сказали мне
    все, что мне нужно было сделать, и они отправили мне пустую карточку, которая
    доставлено мне в течение 3 недель, которые изменили мою жизнь, все, что я хочу сказать, это
    спасибо Джону за то, что помогли мне, если вы страдаете и нуждаетесь в изменении
    о жизни я советую вам связаться с ними сейчас по электронной почте:
    chiyoungtechworld@gmail.com, и ваша жизнь не останется прежней.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello Friends, i want to say a very big thank you to John Brown, i am Mrs
    Jane from US i want to share a testimony of how my life was change by an
    ATM BLANK CARD, i was a very poor man even to eat was a very big problem
    for me and my family i seek for jobs in different place but could not get
    one my rent and bills was too much for me to pay so i had to go to a one
    bed room flat because of the high rate of poverty i became frustrated until
    one certain day when i was checking through the internet i saw many
    different testimony of different people but to one man on how he gave them
    a blank atm card that changed their life, because of the high rate of
    poverty that was affecting me i had to apply on it too they told me
    everything needed for me to do and they sent the atm blank card to me which
    delivered to me within 3weeks that changed my life all i want to say is
    thank you to John for helping me so if you are suffering and need a change
    of life i will advice you to contact them now at their email:
    chiyoungtechworld@gmail.com and your life will not remain the same.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hallo Freunde, ich möchte ein sehr großes Dankeschön an John Brown sagen, ich bin Frau
    Jane aus den USA möchte ich ein Zeugnis davon teilen, wie mein Leben durch eine Veränderung war
    ATM BLANK CARD, ich war ein sehr armer Mann sogar zu essen war ein sehr großes Problem
    für mich und meine Familie suche ich nach Jobs an anderer Stelle, konnte aber nicht
    Einer meiner Miete und Rechnungen war zu viel für mich zu zahlen, so musste ich zu einem gehen
    Schlafzimmer Wohnung wegen der hohen Rate der Armut wurde ich frustriert, bis
    ein bestimmter Tag, als ich durch das Internet überprüft wurde, sah ich viele
    anderes Zeugnis von verschiedenen Menschen, aber zu einem Mann, wie er sie gab
    eine leere ATM-Karte, die ihr Leben verändert, wegen der hohen Rate von
    Armut, die mich betroffen war, musste ich auch darauf anwenden sie sagten mir
    alles, was ich brauchte, und sie schickten mir die leere Karte
    lieferte mir innerhalb von 3 Wochen, die mein Leben verändert alles, was ich sagen will, ist
    Danke an John, dass er mir geholfen hat, wenn du leidest und eine Veränderung brauchst
    des Lebens werde ich Ihnen raten, sie jetzt an ihre E-Mail zu kontaktieren:
    chiyoungtechworld@gmail.com und dein Leben wird nicht gleich bleiben.

    ReplyDelete

  7. Hello Guys,This is a Life Time transformation !!!Am so happy I got mine
    from John Brown. My blank ATM card can withdraw $2,000 daily. I got it from
    Her last week and now I have $8,000 for free. The blank ATM withdraws money
    from any ATM machines and there is no name on it, it is not traceable and
    now i have money for business and enough money for me and my family to live
    on .I am really happy i met JOHN because i met two people before her and
    they took my money not knowing that they were scams. But am happy now. JOHN
    sent the card through DHL and i got it in two days. Get your own card from
    her now she is not like other scammer pretending to have the ATM card,She
    is giving it out for free to help people even if it is illegal but it helps
    a lot and no one ever gets caught. i am grateful to JOHN because she
    changed my story all of a sudden . The card works in all countries except
    Philippines, Mali and Nigeria. John Brown email address is
    chiyoungtechworld@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hallo Freunde, ich möchte ein sehr großes Dankeschön an John Brown sagen, ich bin Frau
    Jane aus den USA möchte ich ein Zeugnis davon teilen, wie mein Leben durch eine Veränderung war
    ATM BLANK CARD, ich war ein sehr armer Mann sogar zu essen war ein sehr großes Problem
    für mich und meine Familie suche ich nach Jobs an anderer Stelle, konnte aber nicht
    Einer meiner Miete und Rechnungen war zu viel für mich zu zahlen, so musste ich zu einem gehen
    Schlafzimmer Wohnung wegen der hohen Rate der Armut wurde ich frustriert, bis
    ein bestimmter Tag, als ich durch das Internet überprüft wurde, sah ich viele
    anderes Zeugnis von verschiedenen Menschen, aber zu einem Mann, wie er sie gab
    eine leere ATM-Karte, die ihr Leben verändert, wegen der hohen Rate von
    Armut, die mich betroffen war, musste ich auch darauf anwenden sie sagten mir
    alles, was ich brauchte, und sie schickten mir die leere Karte
    lieferte mir innerhalb von 3 Wochen, die mein Leben verändert alles, was ich sagen will, ist
    Danke an John, dass er mir geholfen hat, wenn du leidest und eine Veränderung brauchst
    des Lebens werde ich Ihnen raten, sie jetzt an ihre E-Mail zu kontaktieren:
    chiyoungtechworld@gmail.com und dein Leben wird nicht gleich bleiben.

    ReplyDelete